Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox for July 12, 1998:

Impact of Data Quality on the Web User Experience

The Web is all about content. What if this content has errors? Then users may be incapable of using the site since much of their navigation is content-driven, especially when searching. Examples:

In each of these examples, a small error in data quality made the site almost useless for users. Most users will give up when their reasonable attempts result in failure, though power users can often find a way around quality problems. Do not assume that the majority of users are power users, even if you are one yourself.

Prevent Errors

The best solution to data problems is obviously to eliminate them before they reach the site. Traditional guidelines from the days of mainframe data entry are:

Discount Quality Control

If it is not feasible to ensure perfect data quality, then focus on double-checking the most important information. For example, have a second person inspect the records for all best-sellers to ensure their accuracy. If an item is known to be a best-seller off the Web but doesn't sell well online, then double-check its record.

Correct Errors

Enlist the millions of Web users as a distributed quality control department by making it easy for users to report any errors they spot on your site. Have a simple form that can be filled out in less than a minute: remember that the users are doing you a favor. Some sites may even run a modest footer on every page where people can click to report errors on that page.

Offer a small reward to the first user who reports any given error or have regular drawings for a larger prize. The error form should state that user's contact info will be used for awarding the prize and in the rare event that it becomes necessary to ask a follow-up question regarding the error report. Also make it possible for users to remain anonymous when reporting errors.

Function Despite Errors

Despite the best-laid plans, most sites will continue to have some data errors, so their user interface must be error-tolerant and protect users against the effect of the errors.

Almost no search engines do spelling checks, but Barnes & Noble's does. So they pull up my books even if a user spells my name Jacob Nielson (or if the user spells correctly but their database is in error).


July 26, 1998: Electronic books - a bad idea

See Also: List of other Alertbox columns